Rehberg v. Pueblo, County of et al

Filing 71

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs Motion to Modify Scheduling Order with Respect to Expert Disclosures Concerning Liability Experts 69 is GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 8/18/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00261-LTB-KLM RONALD J. REHBERG, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF PUEBLO, OFFICER BRUCE CONSTUBLE, in his official and individual capacity, OFFICER VINCENT PETOKOSEK, in his official and individual capacity, and UNKNOWN PUEBLO POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS 1-2, in their official and individual capacities, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify Scheduling Order with Respect to Expert Disclosures Concerning Liability Experts [Docket No. 69; Filed August 17, 2011] (the “Motion”). Plaintiff represents that Defendants do not object to an extension of the deadline for a governmental liability expert pending resolution of the discovery issue; however, “Defendants object as to all other expert deadlines being extended.” Motion, Docket No. 69 at 3. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Scheduling Order entered on November 8, 2010 [Docket No. 27], and amended on May 2, 2011 [Docket No. 37] and June 10, 2011 [Docket No. 46], is further modified to extend the following deadline. Plaintiff shall disclose his governmental liability expert’s report, limited to one pursuant to Plaintiff’s representation in his Motion, within 30 days after Defendants’ Objection to this Court’s discovery order [Docket No. 52] is resolved by the District Court. All other dates and deadlines remain the same. Dated: August 18, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?