Rehberg v. Pueblo, County of et al
Filing
96
MINUTE ENTRY for Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/1/2011; granting in part and denying in part 93 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Court Order to Obtain Records is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (Court Reporter: FTR - Monique Wiles) (klmcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix
Civil Action No.: 10-cv-00261-LTB-KLM
FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom C-204
Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse
Date: November 1, 2011
Courtroom Deputy, Monique Wiles
________________________________________________________________________
RONALD J. REHBERG
Darold W. Killmer
Qusair Mohamedbhai
Plaintiff(s),
v.
THE CITY OF PUEBLO, et al
Gordon L. Vaughan
Franklin P. Lauer
Defendant(s).
________________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: Motions Hearing
Court in session: 1:32 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
This matter is before the Court regarding Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Court
Order to Obtain Records Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 (2)(b)(2)(B) [Doc. No. 93, filed
10/24/2011].
Comments by counsel.
It is ORDERED:
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Court Order to Obtain
Records Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 (2)(b)(2)(B) [Doc.
No. 93, filed 10/24/2011] is GRANTED in part and DENIED
in part. It is granted to the extent that Plaintiff is required to
follow Cricket’s instructions to obtain call detail records. It is
denied to the extent that it requests that the Court issue the
subpoena to Match.com. The Clerk of Court can issue the
subpoena without any involvement from the Magistrate Judge.
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess: 1:37 p.m.
Total In-Court Time: 5 minutes
To order a transcript of this hearing, please contact Avery Woods Reporting (303)825-6119.
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?