Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Filing 19

ORDER accepting 18 Recommendation Issued June 8, 2010 by Magistrate Judge Tafoya. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Administrative Subpoena directed to Sears, Roebuck Co. shall be revised and limited as set forth in this Order, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 7/6/10.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Walker D. Miller Civil Action No. 10-cv-288-WDM-KMT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., Defendant. ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Miller, J. This matter is before me on the recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya issued June 8, 2010 (Docket No. 36), concerning the Application for an Order to Show Cause Why an Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced (Docket No. 1), and Memorandum in Support of Application for an Order to Show Cause Why an Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced (Docket No. 2), and Respondent's Response to Application for an Order to Show Cause Why an Administrative Subpoena Should Not Be Enforced (Docket No. 11). Plaintiff has not objected to this recommendation and is not entitled to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). I have reviewed the recommendation and agree with its analysis. Accordingly, it is ordered: 1. The recommendation issued June 8, 2010, by Magistrate Judge Tafoya is accepted. 2. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Administrative Subpoena directed to Sears, Roebuck Co. shall be revised and limited as follows: a. The subpoena should be limited, at this time, to ten stores in District 175; and b. the subpoena should omit any requests seeking national origin information. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 6th day of July, 2010. BY THE COURT _____________________________ Walker D. Miller Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?