TIG Global, LLC v. PC Specialists, Inc.

Filing 33

COURTROOM MINUTES - Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: A Motion Hearing was held on 9/21/2010. ORDERED: TIG Global, LLC's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, doc # 25 is GRANTED. The Firs t Amended Complaint (with Exhibits A-H) is treated as a SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING under Rule 15(d) and is deemed filed as of today's date. The court incorporates, by reference, Defendant's current Motions to Dismiss, # 7 and 22 . Defendant is not required to re-file its Motions to Dismiss. Defendant is allowed to file a Supplemental Brief in Opposition by 10/5/2010. Plaintiff is allowed to file a Reply by 10/12/2010. Defendant's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, # 30 is DENIED. All further discovery is STAYED PENDING RULINGS ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. (Court Reporter FTR - Linda Kahoe) (cbscd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No.: 10-cv-00307-PAB-CBS Date: September 21, 2010 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Linda Kahoe

TIG GLOBAL, LLC, Plaintiff, v. PC SPECIALITS, INC., Defendant.

Scott P. Baker Ashley Pollock

Steven C. Schroer

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTIONS HEARING Court in session: 1:30 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion and arguments regarding TIG Global, LLC's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, doc #[25], filed 8/27/2010. ORDERED: TIG Global, LLC's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint, doc #[25] is GRANTED. The First Amended Complaint (with Exhibits A-H) is treated as a SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING under Rule 15(d), and is deemed filed as of today's date. The court incorporates, by reference, Defendant's current Motions to Dismiss, doc #[7] and doc #[22]. The Defendant is not required to re-file its Motions to Dismiss. Defendant is allowed to file a Supplemental Brief in Opposition addressing the legal implications of the Supplemental Pleading on or before OCTOBER 5, 2010. Plaintiff is allowed to file a Reply on or before OCTOBER 12, 2010. Discussion and arguments regarding Defendant's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, doc #[30], filed 9/16/2010. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, doc #[30], DENIED. All further discovery is STAYED PENDING RULINGS ON THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Discussion regarding Mr. Gray's involvement in this case. The court states that Mr. Gray has

not entered an appearance in this case. Mr. Schroer states that Mr. Gray is counsel of record in the California case. The court states counsel should contact chambers if the parties feel a settlement conference will be productive. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: Total time in court: 2:43 p.m. 01:13

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone] or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.