King Auto Group, Inc. v. Chrysler Group, LLC et al
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Philip A. Brimmer. Motion Hearing held on 2/16/2010. Denying 2 Motion for TRO. (Court Reporter Janet Coppock) (pabcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE PHILIP A. BRIMMER COURTROOM MINUTES Courtroom Deputy: Kathy Preuitt-Parks Court Reporter: Janet Coppock Date: February 16, 2010 Time: 2 hours and 3 minutes
CASE NO. 10-cv-00312-REB Parties KING AUTO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff (s), vs. CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC, PRESTIGE CHRYSLER-DODGE, INC., COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE MOTOR VEHICLE BOARD, Defendant (s). Steven Kelso Brendon Reese Jack Trigg Christy Anderson Dan Williams Counsel Robert Miller Craig Allely Michael Sink
HEARING ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER 1:36 p.m. COURT IN SESSION
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Also present are Yale King, on behalf of the plaintiff and Roger Weibel and Jay Weibel on behalf on defendant Prestige Chrysler-Dodge, Inc.
Page Two 10-cv-00312-REB February 16, 2010 Court makes opening remarks and discusses how this hearing shall proceed. Court will address the issue of jurisdiction. 1:43 p.m. 1:47 p.m. Argument by Mr. Williams. Questions by the Court. Argument by Mr. Kelso. Questions by the Court.
ORDERED: Court concludes it has jurisdiction to consider the motion for temporary restraining order. Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc #2), filed 2/12/10. 1:52 p.m. 2:11 p.m. 2:34 p.m. 2:55 p.m. 3:12 p.m. 3:28 p.m. Argument by Mr. Miller. Questions by the Court. Argument by Mr. Kelso. Questions by the Court. Argument by Mr. Williams. Questions by the Court. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Miller. COURT IN RECESS COURT IN SESSION
Court states its findings and conclusions. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc #2), filed 2/12/10 is DENIED. 3:55 p.m. COURT IN RECESS 123 minutes
Total in court time: Hearing concluded
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?