Hadnot v. Army Corps of Engineers et al
Filing
67
ORDER. Pursuant to both parties representations in recent filings 63 , 62 , 61 , requesting that the Settlement Agreement 55 be unsealed. The Settlement Agreement 55 shall be unsealed. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 3/8/2011. (sah, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-0318-REB-CBS VICTOR DARNELL HADNOT, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Pursuant to both parties' representations in recent filings (see Docs. # 63, # 62, # 61), requesting that the Settlement Agreement (Doc. # 55) be unsealed, IT IS ORDERED that the Settlement Agreement (Doc. # 55) shall be unsealed. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 8th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
