Hadnot v. Army Corps of Engineers et al
Filing
89
ORDER. Mr. Hadnot shall appear in person at the hearing on 4/29/2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Failure to appear may constitute contempt of court. By Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 4/22/2011. (sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-0318-REB-CBS
VICTOR DARNELL HADNOT,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN MCHUGH, Secretary of the Army,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
This civil action came before the court on Friday, April 22, 2011 for a hearing to
address several pending motions filed by Plaintiff, Mr. Hadnot. (See Docs. # 69, # 72, #
75, # 77, # 85). Mr. Hadnot did not appear at the hearing. The hearing was set in open
court in Mr. Hadnot’s presence on March 14, 2011. (See Courtroom Minutes/Minute
Order (Doc. # 68)). On April 20, 2011, the court issued a Minute Order reminding Mr.
Hadnot that he was required to appear in person at the April 22, 2011 hearing and that
failure to appear may constitute contempt of a court order. (See Doc. # 84). Upon Mr.
Hadnot’s failure to appear, the court reset the hearing to Friday, April 29, 2011 and
directed Mr. Hadnot to appear in person. (See Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order (Docs.
# 87, # 88)). The court requires Mr. Hadnot’s presence in order to properly address the
numerous issues that Mr. Hadnot has raised in his Motions. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Mr. Hadnot shall appear in person at the hearing on Friday
April 29, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom A402 before Magistrate Judge Craig B.
1
Shaffer. Failure to appear may constitute contempt of court.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 22nd day of April, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/Craig B. Shaffer
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?