Nagim v. Jackson et al

Filing 65

MINUTE ORDER denying 60 Plaintiff's Motion to Deny the Stephen Irving Deception and Fraudulent Claims Again to this Court and the Request of Rule and Order of a Temporary and or Permanent Order. Plaintiff shall not file any further pleadings until the resolution of the pending motions, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/1/10.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00328-PAB-KLM RONALD J. NAGIM, Plaintiff, v. BONNIE F. JACKSON, ALICIA PELLERGRIN, STEVEN IRVING, JOSEPH E. ABRAHAM, JR. SANDRA HOYT ABRAHAM, STEPHEN PUGH, BRANDON FREEMAN, and JOSEPH E. ABRAHAM, III, Defendants. _______________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Deny the Stephen Irving Deception and Fraudulent Claims Again to this Court and the Request of Rule and Order of a Temporary and or Permanent Order [Docket No. 60; Filed June 28, 2010] (the "Motion"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. The Motion is frivolous and nonsensical and impossible for the Court to understand. This is not the first frivolous motion filed by Plaintiff. On June 28, 2010 and June 29, 2010 alone he filed six pleadings that are equally repetitive, frivolous, and incomprehensible. Plaintiff's "rights of access to the courts and to petition for redress certainly do not hinge on his being able to file an endless stream of repetitive, frivolous motions . . . ." Kinnell v. State of Kansas, No. 003235-SAC, 2009 WL 902402, at * 2 (Apr. 1, 2009). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall not file any further pleadings until the resolution of pending motions #11, #13, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #24, #25, #35. Dated: July 1, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?