Nettina v. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Affiliates et al

Filing 41

ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 35 Notice of Appeal by Lauren Nettina, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 04/14/10. (bjrsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00333-ZLW LAUREN NETTINA, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (DOC) AND AFFILIATES, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, PENTAGON, WHITE HOUSE: PRESIDENT BARRACK [sic] OBAMA and FIRST LADY MICHELLE OBAMA, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, FORMER PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH, JR., FORMER FIRST LADY LAURA BUSH, FORMER WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF JOSHUA BOLTEN, and POLICE AND TROOPER DEPARTMENTS OF THE UNITED STATES Defendants.

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL Weinshienk, Senior Judge Plaintiff has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Plaintiff previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because plaintiff has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 14th day of April , 2010.

BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge, for ZITA LEESON WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court