Rocha v. Zavaras et al
Filing
118
ORDER ADOPTS the 106 Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge; denying 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order; by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/4/2011.(erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00357-CMA-MEH
MARCO A. ROCHA,
Plaintiff,
v.
S. TWILLEGER, in an individual capacity,
Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING SEPTEMBER 9, 2011
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 9, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued a
Recommendation (Doc. # 106), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary
Injunction and for Protective Order (Doc. # 99) be denied. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se,
has objected to this recommendation. (Doc. # 116.)
In light of these objections, the Court has conducted the requisite de novo review
of the issues, the Recommendation, and Plaintiff’s objections. Plaintiff fails to raise
any new issues of law or fact warranting a result different from that reached by the
Magistrate Judge in his Recommendation. Based on this de novo review, the Court
concludes that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation correct. Therefore, the Court
hereby ADOPTS the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge as the
findings and conclusions of this Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and
for Protective Order (Doc. # 99) be DENIED.
DATED: October 04 , 2011
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?