Rocha v. Zavaras et al
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 121 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/7/2011. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00357-CMA-MEH
MARCO A. ROCHA,
S. TWILLEGER, individual capacity,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 7, 2011.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike [filed October 24, 2011; docket #121] is denied without
prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a)(1)(D) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 5.1G. Rule
5(a)(1)(D) requires that a written motion filed with the Court must be served on every party. Local
Rule 5.1G requires, in pertinent part, that “[e]ach paper, other than one filed ex parte, shall be
accompanied by a certificate of service indicating the date it was served, the name and address of
the person to whom it was sent, and the manner of service.” Plaintiff’s statement that he “notified
the respondent’s Attorneys to obtain a copy of this motion to strike by calling SCF or throug (sic)
the court’s files” does not meet these requirements. Plaintiff’s alleged restricted access to copies
does not relieve him of his obligation to properly serve Defendant in compliance with the federal
and local rules.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?