Big O Tires, LLC v. Felix Bros., Inc. et al

Filing 164

ORDER granting 163 plaintiff's unopposed motion to quantify prejudgment interest. Judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Felix Bros., Inc. and Ralph Felix on plaintiff's trademark claim in the amount of $2,299.08 plus $350.76 in statutory interest. Judgment shall otherwise enter in accordance with the Court's 162 1/11/2012 ruling. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 1/17/12.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Case No. 10-cv-00362-PAB-KLM BIG O TIRES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company f/k/a BIG O TIRES, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. FELIX BROS., INC., a California corporation, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s unopposed motion to quantify prejudgment interest [Docket No. 163]. On January 11, 2012, the Court ordered that judgment enter, inter alia, in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Felix Bros., Inc. and Ralph Felix on plaintiff’s trademark claim in the amount of $2,299.08, plus statutory interest. See Docket No. 162 at 2. In the present motion, plaintiff requests that the statutory interest due on the $2,299.08 is $350.76. Defendants do not dispute that calculation. Therefore, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s unopposed motion to quantify prejudgment interest [Docket No. 163] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that judgment shall enter in favor of plaintiff and against defendants Felix Bros., Inc. and Ralph Felix on plaintiff’s trademark claim in the amount of $2,299.08 plus $350.76 in statutory interest. Judgment shall otherwise enter in accordance with the Court’s January 11, 2012 ruling [Docket No. 162]. DATED January 17, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?