SBM Site Services, LLC v. Garrett

Filing 539

ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 511 Motion for Protective Order; denying as moot 514 Ables Motion for Enlargement of Time to Supplement Its Responses to SBMs Discovery Requests; denying as moot 521 SBMs Motion to Enforce Prelim inary Injunction and to Inspect Defendant Garretts Computer Equipment. Status Report due by 2/2/2012. Status Conference set for 2/3/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/27/12.(bnbcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00385-WJM-BNB
SBM SITE SERVICES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN GARRETT, an individual, and
CROWN BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC., d/b/a Able Building Maintenance, d/b/a Able
Services, d/b/a Able Acquisition Corp.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)

Defendant Able’s Motion for Entry of Amended Protective Order [Doc. #

511, filed 12/23/2011] (the “Motion for Protective Order”);
(2)

Able’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to Supplement Its Responses to

SBM’s Discovery Requests [Doc. # 514, filed 12/23/2011] (the “Motion for Enlargement”); and
(3)

SBM’s Motion to Enforce Preliminary Injunction and to Inspect Defendant

Garrett’s Computer Equipment [Doc. # 521, filed 1/12/2012] (the “Motion to Enforce”).
I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are
incorporated here. Consistent with my oral rulings,

IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 511] is GRANTED IN PART and

DENIED IN PART as specified on the record. The parties shall submit for my review a revised
protective order, on or before February 3, 2012, and consistent with their agreements reached
during the hearing and with my oral ruling;
(2)

The Motion for Enlargement [Doc. # 514] is DENIED as moot, the passage of

time having rendered it moot. Able shall serve supplemental interrogatory responses, in full
compliance with the formalities of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on or before 12:00 noon
on February 3, 2012. SBM’s request for sanctions, asserted in its response, is DENIED pursuant
to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C;
(3)

The Motion to Enforce [Doc. # 521] is DENIED as moot based on the parties’

agreements reached during the hearing; and
(4)

A telephonic status conference is set for February 3, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., to

discuss scheduling and other discovery related issues. The parties shall initiate an operator
assisted conference call and join the court at 303-844-6408 at the designated time. The parties
shall file a joint status report, on or before 12:00 noon on February 2, 2012, not to exceed ten
pages, identifying the matters to be raised during the telephonic status conference.
Dated January 27, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2