SBM Site Services, LLC v. Garrett

Filing 77

ORDER : granting 55 Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order Limiting the Scope of Defendants Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of Plaintiff. Denying 60 Plaintiff SBM Site Services, LLCs Motion Requesting Additional Time for the Deposition of John Garrett Pursuant to Rule 30(d)(1). granting in part and denying in part 65 Plaintiff SBM Site Services Motion to Compel Responses, Inspection and Production [FRCP 37(a)], by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/19/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 10-cv-00385-REB-BNB SBM SITE SERVICES, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. JOHN GARRETT, an individual, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Limiting the Scope of Defendants' Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of Plaintiff [Doc. # 55, filed 10/1/2010] (the "Motion for Protective Order"); (2) Plaintiff SBM Site Services, LLC's Motion Requesting Additional Time for the Deposition of John Garrett Pursuant to Rule 30(d)(1) [Doc. # 60, filed 10/1/2010] (the "Motion for Additional Time"); and (3) Plaintiff SBM Site Services' Motion to Compel Responses, Inspection and Production [FRCP 37(a)] [Doc. # 65, filed 10/6/2010] (the "Motion to Compel"). I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated by reference. For the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 55] is GRANTED; (2) (3) The Motion for Additional Time [Doc. # 60] is DENIED; and The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 65] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: · GRANTED with respect to Requests for Production No. 20 and 21. The defendant shall produce the hard drives, smart phone, and iPhone at a date, time, and place as the parties may agree, but not later than November 3, 2010, for inspection consistent with the protocol contained in Exhibit M to the Motion to Compel; · GRANTED with respect to Requests for Production No. 3, 16 (limited in time to 7/1/2009 to the present), and 18; · GRANTED with respect to Interrogatories No. 3 and 6; and · DENIED in all other respects. The defendant shall serve supplemental discovery responses consistent with this order on or before November 3, 2010. Dated October 19, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?