Tillotson v. McCeary
Filing
126
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/4/15 striking 124 Motion for Order for Relief. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Case No. 10-cv-00483-REB-NYW
CHRIS TILLOTSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
T. J. McCOY,
Defendant.
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on a letter filed with the court by Plaintiff Chris
Tillotson (“Plaintiff” or “Mr. Tillotson”) [#124], docketed on October 13, 2015, which was
docketed as “Motion for Order for Relief” (the “October 13, 2015 Letter”). Pursuant to the
October 14, 2015 Memorandum [#125], Plaintiff’s submission is before this Magistrate Judge.
On November 19, 2010, the court dismissed this case based on Mr. Tillotson’s “failure to
effect timely service of process and failure to prosecute.” [#71 at 3]. Subsequent to the court’s
November 19, 2010 Order, Mr. Tillotson filed numerous letters with the court, in some instances
requesting that the case be re-opened. For example, on May 30, 2013, Plaintiff requested that the
case be re-opened, based on Plaintiff’s assertions that he “never assaulted [Defendant] Mr.
McCoy and am a victim of circumstance I was in the wrong place at the wrong time,” leading to
Plaintiff’s incarceration. [#95]. On June 7, 2013, the court entered an Order finding that
Plaintiff’s submission did not “provide[] a basis for re-opening this case.” [#97 at 2]. Plaintiff
was ordered to “cease filing papers in this case” and advised that any further filings would be
“stricken without further notice.” [Id.].
Plaintiff’s October 13, 2015 Letter “declare[s]” that Plaintiff is “innocent of assaulting
Officer McCoy,” and requests unspecified “relief.” [#124 at 1]. Consistent with the court’s prior
orders, the court STRIKES the October 13, 2015 Letter, and ORDERS that Plaintiff must cease
further filings in this case.
DATED: November 4, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Nina Y. Wang___________
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?