Baker et al v. Professional Finance Company, Inc.

Filing 92

ORDER denying without prejudice 83 Plaintiffs' Motion (Opposed?) to Add Two Party Defendants, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/14/10.(lyg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 10­cv­00487­CMA­KMT MARK BAKER, and MELISSA BAKER, Plaintiffs, v. PROFESSIONAL FINANCE COMPANY, INC., TRANSUNION LLC, EQUIFAX INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiffs' "Motion (Opposed?) to Add Two Party Defendants" (Doc. No. 83, filed July 9, 2010). To the extent Plaintiffs are seeking to amend their Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, this court has already advised Plaintiffs that when seeking leave of the court to amend a complaint, the motion to amend must detail the proposed amendments and the reasons why such amendments are necessary. In addition, the plaintiff must attach the proposed amended complaint to the motion. The proposed amended complaint must stand alone; it must contain all of the plaintiff's claims. (See Order, Doc. No. 74, entered June 21, 2010.) Here, Plaintiffs again only barely describe the proposed amendments. Additionally, Plaintiffs have not attached a proposed amended complaint to their Motion. To the extent Plaintiffs have attached an "Amended Complaint for Damages" (Doc. No. 86­1) to their "Motion to Amend Complaint" (Doc. No. 86, filed July 9, 2010), the court notes that the parties Plaintiffs seeks to add as defendants in its present Motion, Amaesing Credit Solutions, LLC and Landsafe Credit, Inc., are not featured in the caption, nor are any allegations against these proposed defendants featured in that proposed Amended Complaint. As a result, it is impossible to determine if the proposed amendments are permissible. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' "Motion (Opposed?) to Add Two Party Defendants" (Doc. No. 83) is DENIED without prejudice. Dated this 14th day of July, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?