Rhodes v. Medina et al

Filing 17

ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court a copy of the complete record of Applicant's state court proceedings in People v. Zachary Caine Rhodes, Arapahoe County District Court Case No. 02CR2008, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/23/11. (mnf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00550-PAB ZACHARY C. RHODES, Applicant, v. ANGEL MEDINA, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents. ORDER FOR STATE COURT RECORD After preliminary consideration of the application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, IT IS ORDERED: (1) Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the Respondents shall file with the Clerk of the Court, in electronic format if available, a copy of the complete record of Applicant's state court proceedings in People v. Zachary Caine Rhodes, Arapahoe County District Court Case No. 02CR2008, including all documents in the state court file and transcripts of all proceedings conducted in the state court, but excluding any physical evidence (as opposed to documentary evidence) not relevant to the asserted claims; (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to send copies of this order to the clerk of the state court from which the case originated and to the Court Services Manager, State Court Administrator's Office by United States mail, first class postage prepaid, at the following addresses: Clerk of the Court Arapahoe County Justice Center 7325 S. Potomac Street Centennial, Colorado 80112 Court Services Manager State Court Administrator's Office 101 W. Colfax, Suite 500 Denver, Colorado 80202 DATED March 23, 2011, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?