Contrada, Inc. v. Parsley et al
Filing
114
MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 4/11/2012. As stated on the record, the court GRANTS 97 Motion to Quash and DENIES 99 Motion for Leave. (FTR: Robin Mason) (cbscd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No.: 10-cv-00646-WYD-CBS
Date: April 11, 2012
FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason
CONTRADA, INC.,
Anthony L. Leffert
Plaintiff/Counter Defendant,
v.
ROBIN L. PARSLEY,
Christopher P. Montville
Defendant/Counter Claimant,
N SKY LIVING, INC.,
Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in Session:
3:43 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The court addresses the parties regarding MOTION to Quash Subpoenas to Produce Documents
Directed to Ronald J. Sommers as Trustee (Docket No. 97, filed on 3/21/2012) and MOTION for
Leave to Serve a Subpoena (Docket No. 99, filed on 3/21/2012).
Discussion regarding documents counsel for the defendant is seeking from the trustee, Rule
26(e), seeking relief under Rule 16, notifying opposing party before serving subpoena under
Rule 45, Rule 26(c), discovering non-privileged documents and privacy under Rule 26(b)(1),
Rule 501, Rule 16(b), the amended request for production (Exhibit 4, No. 8 & 9), serving
subpoenas under Rule 45(b)(1), Rule 45(c)(3)(a), Rule 34, and Rule 37(c).
ORDERED: For reasons as stated on the record, the court GRANTS the MOTION to Quash
Subpoenas to Produce Documents Directed to Ronald J. Sommers as Trustee
(Docket No. 97, filed on 3/21/2012) and DENIES the MOTION for Leave to
Serve a Subpoena (Docket No. 99, filed on 3/21/2012)
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess:
Total time in court:
5:12 p.m.
01:29
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
(303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?