USA v. Hopkins
MINUTE ORDER granting 9 the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Defendant's answer due by 7/15/2010. And granting in part and denying in part 10 the Joint Motion to Vacate Status Conference; Status Conference RESET for 7/15/2010 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/6/2010. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00653-RPM-MEH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HAROLD G. HOPKINS, II, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 6, 2010. The Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer [filed May 4, 2010; docket #9] is granted. Defendant may answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before July 15, 2010. The Joint Motion to Vacate Status Conference [filed May 4, 2010; docket #10] is granted in part and denied in part. The Status Conference set for May 28, 2010, is vacated and rescheduled to July 15, 2010, at 9:30 a.m. If Plaintiff submits dismissal papers or requests a consent decree before this date, the Court will vacate the Status Conference. The Status Conference will be held in Courtroom 203 on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. If this date is not convenient, counsel should confer with opposing counsel and contact my Chambers to obtain an alternate date. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling will be entertained unless made five business days prior to the date of the conference. Plaintiff shall notify all parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Status Conference. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?