Moore v. Singhn

Filing 16

ORDER. On or before 6/7/10 plaintiff to provide court with current address where Dr. Singh may be served, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/17/10. (gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 10-cv-00666-MSK-BNB FREDERICK D. MOORE, Plaintiff, v. DR. SINGH, Medical Director or Medical Administrator of the Boulder County Department of Corrections, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The plaintiff filed his Complaint on March 22, 2010 [Doc. #3]. On April 13, 2010, I ordered the United States Marshal to effect service upon the defendant [Doc. #11]. On April 26, 2010, the Marshal filed a Process Receipt and Return which indicates that defendant Singh could not be served at the address provided by the plaintiff because Dr. Singh is no longer employed by the Boulder County Jail and has not been employed there for approximately 9 months [Doc. #13]. A forwarding address was not provided. Accordingly, I ordered the plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before May 17, 2010, why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1. The plaintiff responded to my show cause order [Doc. #15] by requesting an extension of time for an unspecified period in which to provide the court with the address of the defendant. IT IS ORDERED that on or before June 7, 2010, the plaintiff shall provide the court with a current address where Dr. Singh may be served. Failure to provide the defendant's current address on or before June 7, 2010, will result in my recommendation that the action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Dated May 17, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?