Camayo et al v. John Peroulis & Sons Sheep, Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE. The 51 Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate and 53 Amended Motion to Consolidate are granted. The Clerk of the Court shall reassign Civil Action 11-cv-1132 to the undersigned and consolidate it with Civil Action 10-cv-72. The Court further orders that the 18 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss in Civil Action 11-cv-1132 is DENIED AS MOOT, insofar as the Plaintiffs have filed an Amended Complaint and the Defendants have moved (# 49 ) against that Am ended Complaint. The Court is mindful that the more recent motion to dismiss incorporates arguments set forth in the earlier motion, and the denial of the earlier motion does not operate as an adjudication of those arguments incorporated by reference in the more recent motion, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 02/28/2012.(wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Honorable Marcia S. Krieger
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00772-MSK-MJW
ROEL ESPEJO CAMAYO; and
JUVENCIO SAMANIEGO DAMIAN,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN PEROULIS & SONS SHEEP, INC.,
LOUIS PEROULIS;
STANLEY PEROULIS; and
CRISOLOGO DAMIAN,
Defendants.
consolidated with
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01132-REB-CBS
JHOSEMAR SAMANIEGO FERNANDEZ, and
SILVIO INGA BRUNO,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JOHN PEROULIS & SONS SHEEP, INC.,
LOUIS PEROULIS; and
STANLEY PEROULIS,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
______________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Plaintiffs’ Motion to
Consolidate (# 51), and Amended Motion to Consolidate (# 53), filed in Civil Action 10-cv00772. That motion seeks to consolidate Civil Action 11-cv-1132, pending before Judge

Blackburn, with the lower-numbered case pending before the undersigned. It appearing to the
Court that consolidation is appropriate, and with the consent of Judge Blackburn, the motions are
GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall reassign Civil Action 11-cv-1132 to the undersigned
and consolidate it with Civil Action 10-cv-772.
The Court further orders that the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (# 18) in Civil Action
11-cv-1132 is DENIED AS MOOT, insofar as the Plaintiffs have filed an Amended Complaint
and the Defendants have moved (# 49) against that Amended Complaint. The Court is mindful
that the more recent motion to dismiss incorporates arguments set forth in the earlier motion, and
the denial of the earlier motion does not operate as an adjudication of those arguments
incorporated by reference in the more recent motion.
Dated this 28th day of February, 2012

BY THE COURT:

Marcia S. Krieger
United States District Judge