Phathong et al v. Tesco Corporation (US)

Filing 205

ORDER granting 200 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Stay of Execution on Appeal Without Further Bond. The Court hereby ACCEPTS the Supersedeas Bond ECF No. 195 as satisfying the bond requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 (d), by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/9/2012.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00780-WJM-MJW
VON J. PHATHONG, and
JENNIFER D. PHATHONG,
Plaintiffs,
v.
TESCO CORPORATION (US),
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION
ON APPEAL WITHOUT FURTHER BOND

This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Stay of
Execution on Appeal Without Further Bond, filed October 17, 2012 (ECF No. 200). The
Court having reviewed the Defendant’s Unopposed Motion, FINDS that the
Supersedeas Bond already in place (ECF No. 195) is adequate security to protect
Plaintiffs’ interest during the pendency of the appeal in this action.
The Court hereby ACCEPTS the Supersedeas Bond (ECF No. 195) as satisfying
the bond requirements set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(d). In accordance with the
foregoing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Defendant’s unopposed Motion is
GRANTED.

Dated this 9th day of November, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

__________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge

2