Nicastle v. Adams County Sheriff's Office et al
Filing
109
FINAL ORDER AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT UNDER Fed. R. Civ. P. 54 and 58. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/4/2011. (sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 10-cv-0816-REB-KMT
MARK R. NICASTLE
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF DOUGLAS N. DARR, in his official and individual capacity
Defendant.
FINAL ORDER AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54 AND 58
Blackburn, J.
This matter is before the court on the parties’ Stipulation Re: Entry of Final
Judgment Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54 and 58 [#108]1 filed August 25, 2011. The Court,
having reviewed the pleadings, having heard the jury trial proceedings from May 2,
2011, through May 12, 2011, having reviewed the Verdict Form [#102-7], having
reviewed the Parties' Settlement Agreement and General Release [#108-2] and the
Parties' Stipulation Re: Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant To F.R.C.P. 54 and 58
[#108], and being fully advised on the premises, hereby FINDS as follows:
1.
Venue has been considered and is proper.
2.
Defendant, Sheriff Douglas N. Darr ("Darr") is not an infant, incompetent
person, officer or agent of the State of Colorado, or in the military service.
1
“[#108]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
3.
Defendant Darr was served personally on April 15, 2010.
4.
The Court adopts and incorporates the Verdict Form [#102-7] as part of
this Final Order and Order for Judgment Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58.
5.
The Court adopts and incorporates the Settlement Agreement and
General Release [#108-2] as part of this Final Order and Order for Judgment Under
FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58.
6.
The Court adopts and incorporates in this Final Order and Order for
Judgment Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58, the jury's findings on or about May 12,
2011, concerning all claims for relief and affirmative defenses in this Civil Action.
7.
Specifically, the Court FINDS that
a. Nicastle has proven by preponderance of the evidence each and
all of the six (6) essential elements of his claim that Darr retaliated against
Nicastle in violation of Nicastle's First Amendment Right to Freedom of
Speech;
b. Darr did not prove by preponderance of the evidence his
affirmative defense to Nicastle's First Amendment Right to Freedom of
Speech claim;
c. Nicastle has proven by preponderance of the evidence each and
all of the six (6) essential elements of his claim that Darr retaliated against
Nicastle in violation of Nicastle's First Amendment Right to Freedom of
Association;
d. Darr did not prove by preponderance for the evidence his
affirmative defense to Nicastle's First Amendment Right to Freedom of
Association claim.
2
8.
The Court adopts as part of this Final Order and Order for Judgment
Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58, the Jury's findings as set forth above in Paragraph 6
(a-d), and the jury’s award to Nicastle of the following damages set forth in dollars and
cents:
a. Emotional Pain and Suffering: $99,000.00; and
b. Lost Wages: $24,600.00.
9.
The Court adopts as part of this Final Order and Order for Judgment
Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58, the Jury's finding that Plaintiff Nicastle proved by
preponderance of the evidence that Nicastle is entitled to punitive damages that were
caused by the conduct of Darr in the amount of $1.00.
10.
The Court WITHDRAWS and DISCHARGES its Preliminary Injunction
[#18] dated April 27, 2010, and DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to release the $1.00
bond which was deposited by Plaintiff Nicastle.
11.
The Court has carefully reviewed the Parties' Settlement Agreement and
General Release [#108-2] and hereby approves its terms and conditions as part of this
Final Order and Order for Judgment Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58. Specifically,
the Court FINDS that
a. In exchange for a full and final release of all claims that the
Plaintiff has, had, or may have against Defendant, Defendant and his
insurance carrier agree to pay Plaintiff and his attorneys, Elkus & Sisson,
P.C. the total amount of $730,000.00.
b. That Defendant Darr agrees to pay sums necessary to bring
Plaintiff's retirement rate of pay to that of a "topped out" Lieutenant;
c. That Plaintiff Nicastle agrees that he will resign or otherwise
3
voluntarily end his employment with the Adams County Sheriff's Office on
or before August 31, 2011.
12.
That this Court adopts as part of this Final Order and Order for
Judgment Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58, the Parties' agreement that post-judgment
interest will not begin to accrue on the total judgment at the Federal rate of interest until
November 15, 2011.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the parties’ Stipulation Re: Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to
F.R.C.P. 54 and 58 [#108] filed August 25, 2011, is APPROVED on the terms stated in
this order;
2. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 54 and 58, JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of
Plaintiff, Mark R. Nicastle, against Defendant, Sheriff Douglas N. Darr, and the Plaintiff,
Mark R. Nicastle, is awarded the following amounts, to be paid to Plaintiff, Mark R.
Nicastle, by Defendant, Sheriff Douglas N. Darr:
a. The principal amount of $730,000.00; and
b. All sums necessary to bring Plaintiff's retirement rate of pay to that of a
"topped out" Lieutenant;
3. That post-judgment interest shall accrue on the total judgment at the Federal
rate of interest beginning on November 15, 2011, until post-judgment interest is paid in
full;
4. That this Final Order and Order for Judgment Under FED. R. CIV. P. 54
and 58, and the resulting judgment, fully resolve all claims and all of the parties' rights
and liabilities in this case;
5. That the Plaintiff’s Motion To Designate Deposition Testimony of Candi
4
Baker Out of Time [#87] filed April 27, 2011, and the Plaintiff’s Verified Motion To
Obtain Additional Limited Discovery [#105] filed June 17, 2011, both are DENIED as
moot; and
6. That this case is CLOSED.
Dated October 4, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?