Gallardo et al v. USA et al

Filing 162

ORDER Defendant United States of America's 156 motion to exclude the testimony of Stephen Glass, M.D. and 158 motion to exclude the testimony of Michael G. Ross, M.D. shall be restricted at Level One. On or before Monday, 3/26/2012, the U nited States shall re-file without restriction the motions and exhibits thereto with redactions that comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Plaintiffs' deadline to respond to the motions remains the same. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 3/23/12. (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 10-cv-00868-PAB-CBS MARIA GALLARDO and D.R.G., a minor child by and through her natural mother and next best friend, MARIA GALLARDO, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 5.2(a) _____________________________________________________________________ This matter is before the Court on defendant United States of America’s motion to exclude the testimony of Stephen Glass, M.D. [Docket No. 156] and motion to exclude the testimony of Michael G. Ross, M.D. [Docket No. 158] . The United States has filed material along with each motion that violates Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Therefore, it is ORDERED that defendant United States of America’s motion to exclude the testimony of Stephen Glass, M.D. [Docket No. 156] and motion to exclude the testimony of Michael G. Ross, M.D. [Docket No. 158] shall be restricted at Level One. It is further ORDERED that, on or before Monday, March 26, 2012, the United States shall re-file without restriction the motions and exhibits thereto with redactions that comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). Plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to the motions remains the same. DATED March 23, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?