Scott v. Green

Filing 15

ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 11 Notice of Appeal by Lynn Scott, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 08/11/10. (bjrsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO C iv il Action No. 10-cv-00881-ZLW LY N N E. SCOTT, A p p l ic a n t, v. G R E E N , Warden of B.V.C.C., R esp o n d en t. O R D E R DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL W e in s h ie n k , Senior Judge A p p lic a n t has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Applicant previously was allowed to proceed in forma p a u p e r i s pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has d e te rm i n e d that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) o f the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith b e c a u s e applicant has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts i n support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is O R D E R E D that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not ta k e n in good faith. D A T E D at Denver, Colorado, this 11th day of August , 2010. B Y THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER U n i te d States District Judge, for Z IT A LEESON WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge U n i te d States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?