Anderson v. State of Colorado, Department of Corrections et al

Filing 139

ORDER granting 123 Motion for Discovery; denying as moot 124 Motion to Expedite. Counsel are directed to confer and set a new briefing schedule commensurate with the limited additional discovery requested in motion # 123 . The Court requests t hat the discovery be provided cooperatively and with reasonable promptness, and that the briefing schedule be set accordingly. If agreement cannot be reached, please do not file more motions, responses, and replies. Contact Chambers and set a telephone hearing. By Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 01/02/13. (alvsl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge R. Brooke Jackson Civil Action No. 10-cv-01005-RBJ-KMT TROY ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF COLORADO, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUSAN JONES, in her official capacity as warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary, and ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, in his official capacity as the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, Defendants. Order Plaintiff’s Motion for Post-Judgment Discovery [docket #123] is GRANTED. The Court is satisfied that it has the authority to order discovery relevant to compliance with and enforcement of its orders. See New York v. Shore Realty Corp., 763 F.2d 49, 53 (2d Cir. 1985). Plaintiff’s Motion to Expedite Briefing and Discovery [#124] is DENIED AS MOOT. Counsel are directed to confer and set a new briefing schedule commensurate with the limited additional discovery requested in motion #123. The Court requests that the discovery be provided cooperatively and with reasonable promptness, and that the briefing schedule be set accordingly. If agreement cannot be reached, please do not file more motions, responses and replies. Contact Chambers and set a telephone hearing. 1 DATED this 2nd day of January, 2013. BY THE COURT: ___________________________________ R. Brooke Jackson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?