Vastani Company S.A. v. Mexoro Minerals Ltd.

Filing 39

ORDER granting 37 Plaintiff's Amended Unopposed Motion to Reopen Case and for Amendment of Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/19/2011. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01050-MEH-KLM VASTANI COMPANY S.A., Plaintiff, v. MEXORO MINERALS, LTD., Defendant. ORDER Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Amended Unopposed Motion to Reopen Case and for Amendment of Judgment [filed April 9, 2011; docket #37]. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds and concludes: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) and venue in this Court is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a). 2. On September 9, 2010, Defendant Mexoro Minerals Ltd. confessed judgment in favor of the Plaintiff in the amount of $120,000.00. However, Mexoro Minerals Ltd. changed its name to Pan American Goldfields, Ltd. in or about May 2010 [see docket #37-1], and all parties agree that Pan American Goldfields, Ltd. is the proper legal entity responsible for the debt. 3. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a), the Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the Judgment in this case by entering judgment in favor of Vastani Company, S.A. and against Pan American Goldfields, Ltd. in the amount of $120,000.00 plus pre- and post-judgment interest at the applicable statutory rate. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated in Denver, Colorado, this 19th day of April, 2011. BY THE COURT: Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?