Countryman v. Farmers Insurance Exchange et al

Filing 117

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Stipulation of Dismissal 116 is APPROVED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, attorney fees, and other expenses of litigation. The Trial Preparation Conference is VACATED. The jury trial is VACATED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/16/2012. (kfinn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 10-cv-01075-REB-KMT LAWRENCE COUNTRYMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similar situated, Plaintiff, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, an insurer, and owner of MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Stipulation of Dismissal [#116]1 filed October 15, 2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation of Dismissal [#116] filed October 15, 2012, is APPROVED; 2. That the Trial Preparation Conference set for October 19, 2012, is VACATED; 3. That the jury trial set to commence November 5, 2012, is VACATED; 4. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and 1 “[#116]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 5. That all remaining claims of plaintiff, Lawrence Countryman against defendants Farmers Insurance Exchange and Mid-Century Insurance Company, except for those claims asserted on behalf of himself and the purported two-year-limit subclass (as defined in plaintiff’s complaint) that were alleged in plaintiff’s complaint as (1) breach of contract, (2) violation of C.R.S. § § 10-4-635 to -636, (3) willful and wanton breach of contract, (4) deceptive trade practices - violation of C.R.S. § 6-1-105(1), (5) violation of C.R.S. § § 10-3-1115 to -1116, and (6) declaratory relief, which claims were previously dismissed with prejudice by the Order Granting Motion To Dismiss [#100] and which plaintiff has indicated an intention to appeal, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own costs, attorney fees, and other expenses of litigation. Dated October 16, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?