Oakley v. Zavaras et al

Filing 15

MINUTE ORDER denying 4 Motion for Order to initiate service, 5 Motion for Order to initiate service, 11 Motion for Leave to initiate service and 12 Motion for Order to initiate service. Denying as unnecessary 6 and 10 Plaintiff's Motions to Grant Excusable Neglect, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 6/23/10.(gmssl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01121-BNB JACOB DANIEL OAKLEY, 123294, Plaintiff, v. [ARISTEDES] ZAVARAS, Executive Director, SUSAN JONES, Warden, CSP, BOYD, Nurse Practitioner, CSP, ALLENBERG, P.A., Employee #, CSP, TURNER, Employee Number, CSP, SANTOS, C/O, Unite [sic] E-17, CSP, DUTY C/O, Unite [sic] E-17, CSP, DALTON, C/O, E-17, CSP, JOHN DOE, Eye Doctor, CSP, JOHN AND JANE DOE x 30, Medical Personnell [sic] at CTCF, SCCF, CSP, and JOHN AND JANE DOE x 700, at CTCF, SCCF, CSP, (List each named defendant on a separate line), Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND Plaintiff, a pro se litigant, has requested, in Document Nos. 4, 5, 11, and 12, that the Court initiate service. An attempt to initiate service in the instant action, nonetheless, is premature and the requests are denied. Service of process shall not issue until further order of the Court. Also, Plaintiff's Motions to Grant Excusable Neglect, Document Nos. 6 and 10 are denied as unnecessary. Dated: June 23, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?