Hill v. City of Aurora, Colorado
Filing
159
MINUTE ORDER granting in part 104 Plaintiff's (Combined) and (Opposed) Motion For: I. Pending Appeal, a "Stay" on Case and All Case Proceedings and until the Courts Can Rectify Errors in Case Processing and Proceedings; II. Pending A ppeal, Relief from Any and All Orders on Case and All Case Proceedings, and until the Courts Can Rectify Errors in Case Processing and Proceedings. This case is STAYED pending a ruling by the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Case Nos. 11-1287 and 11-1289. The parties shall file a joint status report within ten days of the Circuit Court's ruling on Plaintiff's appeals. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 9/7/11.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 10–cv–01134–PAB–KMT
GEORG K. HILL,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE CITY OF AURORA, COLORADO, a municipal corporation,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
“Plaintiff’s (Combined) and (Opposed) Motion For: I. Pending Appeal, a “Stay” on Case and All
Case Proceedings and until the Courts Can Rectify Errors in Case Processing and Proceedings;
II. Pending Appeal, Relief from Any and All Orders on Case and All Case Proceedings, and until
the Courts Can Rectify Errors in Case Processing and Proceedings” (Doc. No. 104, filed July 8,
2011) is GRANTED in part. This case is STAYED pending a ruling by the Tenth Circuit Court
of Appeals regarding Case Nos. 11-1287 and 11-1289. The parties shall file a joint status report
within ten days of the Circuit Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s appeals.
Dated: September 7, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?