Arc of the Pikes Peak Region, The et al v. National Mentor Holdings, Inc. et al

Filing 46

ORDER: denying 34 Plaintiffs Motion to Stay Rule 12(b)(6) Proceedings Pending Disposition of Motion for Partial Remand or, in the Alternative, for an Unopposed Extension of Time to Submit a Rule 12(b)(6 ) Response. The plaintiffs shall respond to the pending motions to dismiss on or before July 30, 2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/16/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 10-cv-01144-REB-BNB THE ARC OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION, as legal guardian for Angela Bream, Greg Catlett, Gordon Cummins, Vera Guion, Mary Rodgers and Tino Valencia SHARON HARRISON and MICHELLE BOWER, as legal guardians for Randy Bower KARLA DIAZ and CELESTINO PAUL DIAZ, as legal guardian for Felipe Cantrell Cervantes, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL MENTOR HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a/ THE MENTOR NETWORK, its successor and its assignees REM COLORADO, INC., its successors and assignees; and JAN BLOSSER, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the Plaintiffs' Motion to Stay Rule 12(b)(6) Proceedings Pending Disposition of Motion for Partial Remand or, in the Alternative, for an Unopposed Extension of Time to Submit a Rule 12(b)(6 ) Response [Doc. # 34, filed 6/16/2010] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED insofar as it seeks a stay. The plaintiffs shall respond to the pending motions to dismiss on or before July 30, 2010. Dated July 16, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?