Water Pik, Inc. v. Med-Systems, Inc.

Filing 158

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 9/27/2011. Water Pik's Motion to Strike 129 , Motion to Seal 151 , and Motion to Seal 153 are granted. Water Pik's Motion to Strike as to their request for costs and fees is denied. (FTR: Nick Richards) (mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action: 10-cv-01221-PAB-CBS Date: September 27, 2011 FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Nick Richards Parties: Counsel: WATER PIK, INC., Scott Pringle Sinor Lee Frederick Johnston Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, v. MED-SYSTEMS, INC., Heather Cameron Defendant/Counter Claimant. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 1:28 p.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding Water Pik’s Motion to Strike the Expert Report and Exclude the Testimony of Med-Systems’ Damages Expert, Michael R. Bandemer, for Failure to Comply with this Court’s Prior Order and F.R.C.P. 26, Doc # [129], filed June 28, 2011, Water Pik’s Unopposed Motion to Seal Exhibits 10 and 11 of its Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike, Doc # [151], filed August 22, 2011, and Water Pik’s Unopposed Motion to Seal Portions of its Reply in Support of its Motion to Strike, Doc # [153], filed August 22, 2011. For reasons as stated on the record, it is: ORDERED: Water Pik’s Motion to Strike [129], Motion to Seal [151], and Motion to Seal [153] are GRANTED. Water Pik’s Motion to Strike as to their request for costs and fees is DENIED. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 2:04 p.m. Total time in court: 00:36 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?