White v. Santomaso

Filing 108

JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Gregory P. Nessler, Tyler Santomaso against Amy V. White re: 107 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, by Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk on 9/20/2012. (ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 10-cv-01224-WJM-KLM AMY V. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. TYLER SANTOMASO, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GREGORY P. NESSLER, Third-Party Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Granting Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying Third-Party Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment as Moot, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on September 18, 2012, IT IS ORDERED that 1. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Santomaso’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED; 2. Third-Party Defendant Nessler’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 88) is DENIED AS MOOT; 3. Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Santomaso on Plaintiff White’s civil conspiracy claim; 4. Santomaso’s claim for contribution brought against Third-Party Defendant Nessler is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 5. Each party shall bear their own costs. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 20th day of September, 2012. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, Clerk By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?