Lazarov v. Kimmel et al

Filing 34

MINUTE ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and 12(f) 28 is granted to the extent that paragraph 3 of the plaintiffs Motion for a Se cond Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 25 is stricken. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiffs Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint 25 is granted. Plaintiffs response 31 was thus timely filed. by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/1/2010.(erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01238-CMA-MJW MALINA V. LAZAROV, Plaintiff, v. JAMES KIMMEL, SUZANNE STAIERT, JOHN JONES, and TRENT COOPER, Defendant(s). MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's "Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time" Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and 12(f) (Docket No. 28) is granted to the extent that paragraph 3 of the plaintiff's Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants' Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 25) is stricken. It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion for a Second Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendants' Combined Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 25) is granted. Plaintiff's response (Docket No. 31) was thus timely filed. Date: September 1, 2010