Burris v. Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, et al

Filing 73

ORDER 61 Unopposed MOTION to Seal filed by Mark Birkholz, Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, is DENIED; and 62 MOTION to Compel filed by Mark Birkholz, Comcast of Colorado IX, LLC, is GRANTED, The plaintiff shall produce an unredacted copy of Amanda Torontos case notes on or before August 2, 2011. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/26/2011. (erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01265-WJM-BNB
KOLLEEN BURRIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMCAST OF COLORADO IX, LLC, and
MARK BIRKHOLZ, in all capacities,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)

Defendants’ Motion to Compel [Doc. # 62, filed 7/8/2011] (the “Motion to

Compel”); and
(2)

Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Seal [Doc. # 61, filed 7/8/2011] (the

“Motion to Seal”).
I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are
incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 62] is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall produce an

unredacted copy of Amanda Toronto’s case notes on or before August 2, 2011;
(2)

The Motion to Seal [Doc. # 61] is DENIED; and

(3)

The portion of this Order denying the Motion to Seal shall be effective and Doc. #

63 shall be unsealed and deemed a part of the public record at the later of: (a) August 10, 2011;

or (b) following a ruling by the district judge if an objection to this Order is filed. See
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2J.
Dated July 26, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2