20/20 Financial Consulting, Inc. v. Clear Creek Consulting, Inc.

Filing 18

MINUTE ORDER granting 15 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Amend the Complaint. The Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint [15-1] for filing as of the date of this order. by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 12/3/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01348-CMA-KLM 20/20 FINANCIAL CONSULTING, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. CLEAR CREEK CONSULTING, INC., a Colorado corporation, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Complaint [Docket No. 15; Filed December 1, 2010] (the "Motion"). The Motion is timely, pursuant to the deadline established in the Scheduling Order [Docket No. 8] entered on September 2, 2010. The Court has discretion to grant a party leave to amend its pleadings. Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2) ("The court should freely give leave when justice so requires."). "In the absence of any apparent or declared reason­such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of the amendment, etc.­the leave sought should, as the rules require, be `freely given.'" Id. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 15-1] for filing as of the date of this order. Dated: December 3, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?