General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. Chumley et al

Filing 60

MINUTE ORDER. Defendants' 57 Second Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order is granted. The 26 Scheduling Order is amended to reflect the following new deadlines: Deadline for expert witness designation: 7/15/2011; Deadline for service of writt en discovery requests: 8/1/2011; Deadline for designation of rebuttal expert witnesses: 8/15/2011; Deadline for completion of discovery: 9/1/2011; Deadline for filing dispositive motions: 10/3/2011. Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Extension of Time to Designate Expert Witness Regarding Damages is denied as moot. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 11/17/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/11/2011. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/18/11.(mnf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01398-PAB-KLM GENERAL STEEL DOMESTIC SALES, LLC, d/b/a GENERAL STEEL CORPORATION, a Colorado limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. ETHAN DANIEL CHUMLEY, individually, and ATLANTIC BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware corporation, doing business as ARMSTRONG STEEL CORPORATION, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Second Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [Docket No. 57; Filed April 15, 2011] and Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Designate Expert Witness Regarding Damages [Docket No. 58; Filed April 15, 2011]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [#57] is GRANTED. Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Order [Docket No. 26] is amended to reflect the following new deadlines: Deadline for expert witness designation: July 15, 2011 Deadline for service of written discovery requests: August 1, 2011 Deadline for designation of rebuttal expert witnesses: August 15, 2011 Deadline for completion of discovery: September 1, 2011 Deadline for filing dispositive motions: October 3, 2011 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time [#58] is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference set for August 1, 2011 -1- at 9:30 a.m. is vacated and RESET to November 17, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C204 of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed pretrial order no later than November 11, 2011. Parties participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The proposed pretrial order must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., as a WordPerfect document). Pursuant to the ECF Procedures, the parties shall submit the proposed pretrial order via email to Mix_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. Parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial order to the Clerk of the Court as a hard copy. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed pretrial order pursuant to the ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed pretrial order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the Court’s website at www.co.uscourts.gov. Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. Courtroom C-204 is located on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The parties are reminded that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B. Dated: April 18, 2011 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?