General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. Chumley et al
Filing
60
MINUTE ORDER. Defendants' 57 Second Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order is granted. The 26 Scheduling Order is amended to reflect the following new deadlines: Deadline for expert witness designation: 7/15/2011; Deadline for service of writt en discovery requests: 8/1/2011; Deadline for designation of rebuttal expert witnesses: 8/15/2011; Deadline for completion of discovery: 9/1/2011; Deadline for filing dispositive motions: 10/3/2011. Plaintiff's 58 Motion for Extension of Time to Designate Expert Witness Regarding Damages is denied as moot. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 11/17/2011 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 11/11/2011. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/18/11.(mnf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01398-PAB-KLM
GENERAL STEEL DOMESTIC SALES, LLC, d/b/a GENERAL STEEL CORPORATION,
a Colorado limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
v.
ETHAN DANIEL CHUMLEY, individually, and
ATLANTIC BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC, a Delaware corporation, doing business as
ARMSTRONG STEEL CORPORATION,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Second Motion to Amend the
Scheduling Order [Docket No. 57; Filed April 15, 2011] and Plaintiff’s Motion for
Extension of Time to Designate Expert Witness Regarding Damages [Docket No. 58;
Filed April 15, 2011].
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order
[#57] is GRANTED. Accordingly,
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Order [Docket No. 26] is amended
to reflect the following new deadlines:
Deadline for expert witness designation:
July 15, 2011
Deadline for service of written discovery requests:
August 1, 2011
Deadline for designation of rebuttal expert witnesses:
August 15, 2011
Deadline for completion of discovery:
September 1, 2011
Deadline for filing dispositive motions:
October 3, 2011
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time [#58] is DENIED
as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference set for August 1, 2011
-1-
at 9:30 a.m. is vacated and RESET to November 17, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C204 of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit their proposed pretrial order
no later than November 11, 2011. Parties participating in ECF shall submit their proposed
pretrial order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The proposed pretrial
order must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., as a WordPerfect document). Pursuant
to the ECF Procedures, the parties shall submit the proposed pretrial order via email to
Mix_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. Parties not participating in ECF shall submit their
proposed pretrial order to the Clerk of the Court as a hard copy. However, if any party in
this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed
pretrial order pursuant to the ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed
pretrial order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext
format from the forms section of the Court’s website at www.co.uscourts.gov.
Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the
website.
Courtroom C-204 is located on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United
States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The parties are reminded
that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be
required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2B.
Dated: April 18, 2011
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?