Hackett v. Breg, Inc.

Filing 139

MINUTE ENTRY for Trial Preparation Conference held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on 10/28/2011. Finding as moot 104 Motion to Exclude. (Court Reporter: Kara Spitler) (lag)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge R. Brooke Jackson Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera Court Reporter: Kara Spitler Date: October 28, 2011 Civil Action No. 10-cv-01437-RBJ-KMT Parties: Counsel: ERIC HACKETT, Colin King Richard Hood Jessica Andrew Aimee Wagstaff Plaintiff, v. BREG, INC., Defendant. Jordan Lipp Jeffrey Pilkington Sheryl Bjork Jeff Pilkington COURTROOM MINUTES Trial Preparation Conference 1:31 p.m. Court in session. Argument from Mr. King and Ms. Schmid regarding Breg Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Suzanne Parisian, M.D. Doc.# [104]. Discussion regarding the scope of anticipated testimony from witnesses Suzanne Parisian, M.D. and Dr. Ferrari. Parties advise the Court they are not in a position to make objections to specific deposition testimony at this time. Court reviews the proposed jury instructions with counsel. 3:20 p.m. 3:31 p.m. Court in recess. Court in session. Continued discussion of jury instructions. Plaintiff shall modify the jury instructions and arrange them in the order they will be presented to the jury. Parties will submit a status report regarding any remaining issues as to the special verdict form and deposition designation by November 2, 2011. Parties stipulate that no supplemental questionnaire is necessary. Discussion regarding opening statements and the use of exhibits. Parties will work together on a single exhibit list with respect to medical records. ORDERED: Breg Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Suzanne Parisian, M.D. Doc.# [104] is MOOT as the issue was resolved among the Court and counsel. 4:04 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total Time: 2:22 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?