Onyx Properties LLC et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Elbert County
Filing
150
ORDER on December 19, 2014 Hearing by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/22/14. (dkals, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 10-cv-01482-LTB-KLM
ONYX PROPERTIES LLC, a Colorado limited liability company;
EMERALD PROPERTIES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company;
VALLEY BANK AND TRUST, a Colorado State bank;
PAUL NAFTEL, an individual;
SHAUNA NAFTEL, an individual; and
The Estate of LOCAL SERVICE CORPORATION by and through its
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee, SIMON E. RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ELBERT COUNTY, in its official capacity,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER ON DECEMBER 19, 2014 HEARING
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter came before the Court at a hearing held on December 19, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. As
discussed with counsel at the hearing, the Court orders as follows:
1.
The March 16, 2015 trial setting and January 30, 2015 trial preparation conference in this
case are vacated.
2.
The parties shall file any motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 by January 16,
2015. Any responses shall be filed by January 30, 2015 and any replies shall be filed by
February 13, 2015.
3.
A motions hearing is set for March 16, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The Court will
hear argument on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 141] as well as any
Rule 702 motions.
4.
Plaintiffs shall file a status report with the Court by January 8, 2015, in which Plaintiffs shall
indicate whether they are electing to waive a jury trial and proceed with a bench trial in this
matter.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
DATED: December 22 , 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?