King v. Astrue

Filing 10

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/5/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 12/16/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 1/5/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 09/28/2010. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 10-cv-01530-AP NOEL KING, Plaintiff,
v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Diane K. Bross, Esq. 4419 Centennial Blvd., #221 Colorado Springs, CO 80907 Telephone [phone] [e-mail] For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] DEBRA J. MEACHUM Special Assistant U. S. Attorney [e-mail] Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 Telephone: [phone]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. Date Complaint Was Filed: 6/29/10. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 7/7/10. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 9/7/10.

4.

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge, the record is complete. Defendant states: To the best of his knowledge, the record is complete.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Plaintiff states: None anticipated. Defendant states: None anticipated.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS None.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. C. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: Defendant's Response Brief Due: Plaintiffs Reply Brief (if any) Due: 11/5/10 12/16/10 1/5/11

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

2

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11.

OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 28th day of September, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane _________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3

APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/Diane K. Bross Diane K. Bross, Esq. 4419 Centennial Blvd., #221 Colorado Springs, CO 80907 Telephone [phone] [e-mail] For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] s/Debra J. Meachum Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant U. S. Attorney [e-mail] Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 Telephone: [phone]

4