Buys et al v. City of Lone Tree, The et al

Filing 67

ORDER. The Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice of All Remaining Claims By Plaintiff Buys Against The City of Lone Tree 65 filed 12/8/2011, is APPROVED. The claims of plaintiff, Myra Buys, against defendant, The City of Lone Tree, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Plaintiff, Myra Buys, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/9/2011. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 10-cv-01536-REB-KLM MYRA BUYS, MELINDA PACHELLO, and TODD PACHELLO, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF LONE TREE, JACK HIDAHL, MICHELLE KIVELA, STEPHEN P. HASLER, DAVID BROWN, BRETT CALLAHAN, and RONALD PINSON, individually and in their official capacities, Defendants. ORDER Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice of All Remaining Claims By Plaintiff Buys Against The City of Lone Tree [#65]1 filed December 8, 2011. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that the claims of plaintiff, Myra Buys, against defendant, The City of Lone Tree, should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice of All Remaining 1 “[#65]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. Claims By Plaintiff Buys Against The City of Lone Tree [#65] filed December 8, 2011, is APPROVED ; 2. That the claims of plaintiff, Myra Buys, against defendant, The City of Lone Tree, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs; and 3. That plaintiff, Myra Buys, is DROPPED as a named party to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated December 9, 2011, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?