Coit v. No Defendants Named
Filing
35
Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 33 "Motion to Correct Typing Errors in Objection to Order of Dismissal and Discrimination Against the Physical [sic] Impaired," by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/20/11.(lyg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01555-LTB
JILL COIT,
Plaintiff,
v.
A. ZAVARAS, Director of CDOC,
THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
JAMES WELTON,
GOVERNOR BILL RITTER, JR.,
LARRY REID,
ROBERT CANTWELL
MAJOR WAID,
MICHAEL DOUSSARD (Spelling),
DENNIS HOUGNON,
UNNAMED/UNKNOWN DEFENDANT WHO TOOK LEGAL SUPREME COURT MAIL
STAMPED OCTOBER 28, 2008,
UNNAMED/UNKNOWN DEFENDANT WHO CHANGED COMPUTER LEGAL MAIL
LOG,
CATHIE HOLST,
DR. P. FRANTZ,
RANDY SMITH,
SGT. HATFIELD,
CAPTAIN KITTY ARNOLD,
UNNAMED/UNKNOWN DWCF OFFICER THAT TOOK PLAINTIFF’S TWO CUBIC
FEET OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS,
UNNAMED/UNKNOWN DWCF OFFICER THAT TOOK/LOST PLAINTIFF’S
ORTHOPEDIC MEDICAL SHOES THAT ABILITY UNLIMITED MADE,
SGT. LASO,
UNKNOWN/UNNAMED DWCF STAFF WHO TOOK MEDICAL DOCUMENTS FROM
PLAINTIFF’S MEDICAL FILE,
JOAN SHOEMAKER,
UNNAMED/UNKNOWN LVCF OFFICER THAT PACKED PLAINTIFF OUT ON 7-23-10
(2 OFFICERS),
SGT. FIELDS,
SGT/CAPT. BUTCHER,
ASSOCIATE WARDEN SCOTT HALL, DWCF,
JOHN MARTIN, DWCF,
TCF WARDEN PELLANT, The Topeka Correctional Facility,
DR. MCMASTERS (T.C.F.),
SGT. BLAND 1435,
ANTHONY DECESARO, and
DR. MARTINEZ-HOCHBE-YENETT (T.C.F.),
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY SENIOR JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK
This matter is before the Court on the “Motion to Correct Typing Errors in
Objection to Order of Dismissal and Discrimination Against the Physical [sic] Impaired”
(docket no. 33) that Plaintiff, Jill Coit, submitted to and filed with the Court on April 18,
2011. Ms. Coit seeks to correct typographical errors in an objection to the dismissal
order (docket no. 15) she apparently believes she filed. However, no such objection
has been filed. Therefore, the motion is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: April 20, 2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?