Webb v. Astrue

Filing 11

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/17/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 12/17/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 1/3/2011, by Judge John L. Kane on 9/22/10. (gmssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01616-AP MARILYNN O. WEBB, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Jeannine LaPlace Law Offices of Binder and Binder, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 520 New York, New York 10165 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Acting Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 303-844-0815 303-844-0770 Facsimile [e-mail]

-1-

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: July 09, 2010 July 16, 2010 September 14, 2010

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of her knowledge, Counsel for Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate. To the best of her knowledge, Counsel for Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES Counsel for Plaintiff states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses. Counsel for Defendant states: To the best of her knowledge, this case does not involve unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS There are no other matters anticipated. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE Counsel for both parties agree to the following proposed briefing schedule, which has been adjusted two days past the standard 40 days: A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: November 17, 2010 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: December 17, 2010 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: January 3, 2011 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument -2-

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY=S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 22nd day of September 2010 BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:

s/Jeannine LaPlace Jeannine LaPlace Law Offices of Binder and Binder, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 520 New York, New York 10165 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail]

JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Acting Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorodo s/ Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 303-844-0815 303-844-0770 Facsimile [e-mail]

-3-