HealthOne of Denver, Inc. et al v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated

Filing 109

ORDER. The Motion for Entry of Protective Order 91 is DENIED; Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Licenses 94 is DENIED; The Motion to Clarify 100 is GRANTED to specify that the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of UnitedHealth may occur in its entirety at a date and time as the parties may agree provided that it is completed on or before 12/21/2011; The Motion for Extension 103 is GRANTED to allow the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of G2 Direct & Digital to occur at a date and time as the parties and the deponent may agree provided that it is completed on or before 12/21/2011; and (5) Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Seal 104 is GRANTED, and Doc. # 102-4 shall remain sealed, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/22/11. (lsw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01633-WYD-BNB
HEALTHONE OF DENVER, INC., and
HCA-HEALTHONE, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)

Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Protective Order [Doc. # 91, filed 9/2/2011];

(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Licenses [Doc. # 94, filed

9/2/2011];
(3)

Joint Motion to Modify or Clarify the Court’s August 29, 2011 Order [etc.]

[Doc. # 100, filed 9/14/2011] (the “Motion to Clarify”);
(4)

Joint Motion to Allow 30(b)(6) Deposition fo G2 Direct and Digital Beyond

Discovery Deadline [Doc. # 103, filed 9/16/2011] (the “Motion for Extension”); and
(5)

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Seal [Doc. # 104, filed 9/16/2011].

I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are
incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)

The Motion for Entry of Protective Order [Doc. # 91] is DENIED;

(2)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production of Licenses [Doc. # 94] is DENIED;

(3)

The Motion to Clarify [Doc. # 100] is GRANTED to specify that the Rule

30(b)(6) deposition of UnitedHealth may occur in its entirety at a date and time as the parties
may agree provided that it is completed on or before December 21, 2011;
(4)

The Motion for Extension [Doc. # 103] is GRANTED to allow the Rule 30(b)(6)

deposition of G2 Direct & Digital to occur at a date and time as the parties and the deponent may
agree provided that it is completed on or before December 21, 2011; and
(5)

Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Seal [Doc. # 104] is GRANTED, and Doc. #

102-4 shall remain sealed.
Dated September 22, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge

2