James v. Heuberger Motors, Inc.

Filing 60

ORDER denying 51 Plaintiffs motion to file in excess of 20 pages for Response; Denying Without Prejudice 52 Plaintiff's Motion to Seal; Doc. 53 and 54 are hereby STRICKEN for failure to comply with this Courts practice standards by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/13/2011.(erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01648-CMA-KLM
HARRY JAMES,
Plaintiff,
v.
HEUBERGER MOTORS, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Defendant.

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE
TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion For Permission To File
Response To Summary Judgment In Excess of 20 Pages (Doc. # 51) and Motion
To Seal (Doc. # 52). Upon review of the filings surrounding Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s responses, the Court finds as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s motion to file in excess of 20 pages (Doc. # 51) is DENIED.

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s response and finds it to be unnecessarily verbose.
Plaintiff shall have to and including April 20, 2011 to file a response that conforms to
this Court’s page limits;
2.

Doc. ## 53 and 54 are hereby STRICKEN for failure to comply with this

Court’s practice standards; and

3.

Plaintiff’s motion to seal (Doc. # 52) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

for failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2B and 7.2C. Local Rule 7.2B provides:
A stipulated protective order or confidentiality agreement executed by
the parties, standing alone, will not suffice for sealing a paper or closing a
court proceeding to the public, will not substitute for the showing required
by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2C, and will not be binding on the court. Any
document that a party asserts should not be part of the public record
pursuant to a protective order or a confidentiality agreement shall be filed
as a sealed document. The document shall be sealed for 14 days. If no
motion to seal is filed within 14 days, the document shall be automatically
unsealed.
Plaintiff should either (i) make his arguments without articulating the confidential
information, or (ii) publicly file his Response with redactions and request permission
to file the unredacted pages under seal.
DATED: April

13

, 2011
BY THE COURT:

_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge

2