Quienalty et al v. Newcomb Hardware, Inc. et al

Filing 62

MINUTE ORDER: granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 10/15/2011, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/28/11.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-01781-MSK-BNB BOBBIE QUIENALTY, and CHARLES QUIENALTY, Plaintiffs, v. NEWCOMB HARDWARE, INC., HAROLD F. NEWCOMB, JR., KELLY NEWCOMB, DESIGN IMPORTS, INC., a/k/a DESIGN IMPORTS OF INDIA, a/k/a DESIGNIMPORTS.COM, a/k/a DII, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Unopposed Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [docket no. 60, filed July 27, 2011] (the “Motion”). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. All extensions are granted except for discovery cut-off, which is only extended to and including the same date as the dispositive deadline, October 15, 2011. Expert Witness Disclosures: The defendants shall designate all experts and rebuttal experts provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before September 1, 2011; The plaintiffs shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before September 15, 2011. DATED: July 28, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?