Torres v. Fender et al

Filing 35

ORDER granting 34 Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Certain Claims With Prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Commerce City is to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as a party to the above-captioned action.Denying as moot 32 Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment; by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 5/18/2011.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 10-cv-01793-CMA-KLM FRANCISCO TORRES, Plaintiff, v. COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER NICHOLAS LANGDON, COMMERCE CITY POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL KIM, and CITY OF COMMERCE CITY, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE The parties’ Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Certain Claims With Prejudice (Doc. # 34) is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulated Motion, the following claims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear his or its own costs and attorney’s fees with respect to these claims: 1) Monell claim against the City of Commerce City; 2) Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendant Officers Langdon and Kim; 3) Constitutional failure to properly train and supervise against the City of Commerce City; and 4) Refusing or neglecting to prevent (including conspiracy) against Defendant Officers Langdon and Kim. The only claims remaining in this case are the Fourth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendant Officers Langdon and Kim as contained in Plaintiff’s Second Claim for Relief. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the City of Commerce City is to be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as a party to the above-captioned action. The caption on all subsequent filings shall reflect the removal of the City of Commerce City as a Defendant in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because this Order addresses all issues asserted by Defendants in their Combined Motion and Memorandum Brief In Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. # 32), said Motion is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. DATED: May 18 , 2011 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?