Sigler v. Chase Manhattan Bank et al

Filing 156

ORDER: The Motion to Join and Amend [Doc. # 153 ] is STRICKEN. The "Emergency Ex-Parte Order" [Doc. # 154 ] shall be unrestricted and open to public inspection. The "Emergency Ex-Parte Order" [Doc. # 154 ] is STRICKEN. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/9/2014.(klyon, ) Modified on 7/10/2014 to correct file date (klyon, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 10-cv-01794-LTB-BNB CURT ALLEN SIGLER, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following papers filed by the plaintiff: (1) Motion to Join and Amend [Doc. #153, filed 06/24/2014]; and (2) Emergency Ex-Parte Order [Doc. #154, filed 06/24/2014]. The plaintiff seeks to amend the Complaint. He also seeks injunctive relief. However, this action was dismissed with prejudice on November 28, 2012, due to the plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial system and his repeated failures to comply with applicable rules and orders of the court [Doc. #138]. The plaintiff may not file any further papers in this action. In addition, the “Emergency Ex-Parte Order” was filed under restriction. The plaintiff did not file a motion to restrict access, nor did he comply with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2. I have reviewed the paper, and I do not find any justification for restricting public access to it. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to Join and Amend [Doc. #153] is STRICKEN; (2) The “Emergency Ex-Parte Order” [Doc. #154] shall be unrestricted and open to public inspection; and (3) The “Emergency Ex-Parte Order” [Doc. #154] is STRICKEN. Dated July 9, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?