Sigler v. Chase Manhattan Bank et al

Filing 44

ORDER. Plaintiffs pro se Objection to Magistrates Recommendations Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 42 is DENIED AS MOOT.By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/27/2011. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Action No. 10-cv-01794-LTB-BNB
CURT ALLEN SIGLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
JANE OR JOHN DOE #1, an unidentified teller at an unknown branch of Chase Bank in
Colorado,
JANE OR JOHN DOE #2, an unidentified supervisor or branch manager at an unknown
branch of Chase Bank in Colorado,
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA,
THE CORPORATION COMPANY, and
JAMES DIMON,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________

Upon Plaintiff’s pro se Objection to Magistrate’s Recommendations Pursuant to Fed.
R. Civ. P. 72(b) (Doc 42 - filed October 26, 2011), it is
ORDERED that the Objection is DENIED AS MOOT as a result of the Orders
entered by this Court on October 12, 2011 (Doc 38) and October 19, 2011 (Doc 40).

BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:

October 27, 2011