Hardy v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 92

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice 91 is APPROVED. Any pending motion is DENIED as moot. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/18/2011. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 10-cv-01880-REB–MJW
MARCUS E. HARDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation,
Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice [#91]1 filed
November 18, 2011. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation
should be approved and that this action should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice [#91] filed November 18, 2011,
is APPROVED;
2. That any pending motion is DENIED as moot; and
3. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own
attorney fees and costs.
Dated November 18, 2011, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

1

“[#91]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.